Routing transformation example

This topic describes the examples of routing transformation.

Example 1 (Basic rule): Two routings are merged

In this example, Routing 1 and Routing 2 of Case 1 are compared. The routings are applicable for the same item and location.

Table 1. Before Transformation
Scenario Routing Routing Location Routing Item Routing Item Location

Routing

Type

Routing

Version

Routing

Alternative code

Effective From Quantity
Case 1 - Routing 1

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+001+A1+19990202

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 001 1 A1
Case 1 - Routing 2

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+001+A2+19990202

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 001 1 A2
Table 2. After Transformation
Scenario Routing Routing Location Routing Item Routing Item Location

Routing

Type

Routing

Version

Routing

Alternative code

Effective From Quantity
Case 1 - New Routing 1

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+19990202+ Standard

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 001 Standard null

Example 2: Routings are not merged

In this example, Routings 1 and 2 of Case 1 and Routings 1 and 2 of Case 2 are compared. The routings are applicable for the same item but the location for Case 2 is different.
Table 3. Before Transformation
Scenario Routing Routing Location Routing Item Routing Item Location

Routing

Type

Routing

Version

Routing

Alternative code

Effective From Quantity
Case 1 - Routing 1

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+001+A1+19990202

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 001 1 A1
Case 1 - Routing 2

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+001+A2+19990202

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 001 1 A2
Case 2 - Routing 1

F-B02+AS-100-FERM+001+A1+19990202

F-B02 AS-100-FERM W-902 001 A1
Case 2 - Routing 2

F-B02+AS-100-FERM+001+A2+19990202

F-B02 AS-100-FERM W-902 001 A2
Table 4. After Transformation
Scenario Routing Routing Location Routing Item Routing Item Location

Routing

Type

Routing

Version

Routing

Alternative code

Effective From Quantity
Case 1 - New Routing 1

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+19990202+Standard

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 001 Standard null
Case 2 - New Routing 1

F-B02+AS-100-FERM+19990202+Standard

F-B02 AS-100-FERM W-902 001 Standard null

Example 3: Two routings are not merged as the input items are different

In this example, Routing 1 and Routing 2 of Case 3 are compared.
Table 5. Before Transformation
Scenario Routing Routing Location Routing Item Routing Item Location

Routing

Type

Routing

Version

Routing

Alternative code

Effective From Quantity
Case 3 - Routing 1

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+001+19990202FERM +001+A1+19990202

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 001 1
Case 3 - Routing 2

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+002+19990202

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 002 1
Table 6. After Transformation
Scenario Routing Routing Location Routing Item Routing Item Location

Routing

Type

Routing

Version

Routing

Alternative code

Effective From Quantity
Case 3 - Routing 1

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+19990202+IN-001

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 001 IN-001 Null
Case 3 - Routing 2

F-B01+AS-100-FERM+19990202+IN-002

F-B01 AS-100-FERM W-901 002 IN-002 Null